🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to find the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.